"So The Fight: Lights Out has 47 Metascore. IGN is still wrong?"
I don't know if the games is THAT bad, but let me tell you something about "metascores". They mean shit. First of all, they are "weighted" by whatever "Metacritic" think each singular reviewer's word is worth. Just WTF? Why would anyone trust that crap? Do it like GameRankings, a simple average and that's it.
Anyway, it's people who decide what they like or what they don't. You read some of the bad, you read some of the good and use it as a guide, not something to decide for you. See, GTAIV is the highest ranked game in Metacritc and I wouldn't give that game more than an average 6. That's me, that's what counts to ME, so I couldn't care less about people getting all jizzed-up because of Rockstar games. Same goes for Red Dead. That's a barely a 7 in my book. And I'm not talking about "gaming taste" here, I could make a very reasonable review to justify my scores and taste wouldn't have a 1% to do with it.
