By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sapphi_snake on 17 November 2010
Edit Thread
pizzahut451 said:
sapphi_snake said:
pizzahut451 said:


Number 3 is also important IMO. When someone killed or tortured a cat or dog, he or she shouldnt get the same sentence as someone who killed a human

We shouldn't exaggerate when talking about protecting animals. After all, we do eat anomals, don't we? There are slaughterhouses where cattle are killed, fisherman who catch fish, and the a-holes of the British royal family go on regular hunting trips in africa and kill poor animals just for fun. Why should a dog's life be valued more than a deer's life?

Age should also be considerd. I think that the offender should get a higher sentence for beating up a kid than he does for beating up an adult man. I mean, an adult can somehow protect himself or herself, while child is still innocent and cant reallz do anything.

Hmmm, I'm not sure if that should matter honestly. But was this replay really aimed towards me?



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)