By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
theprof00 on 16 November 2010
Edit Thread
heruamon said:
theprof00 said:
Jadedx said:
ethomaz said:
Jadedx said:

Ethomaz everyone can see that you have an ulterior motive.

And? My "ulterior motives" don't change the fact.


Atlest you finally admit that you have ulterior motives, but the only fact is that you were wrong about shipped, and you're wrong about this  aswell.

You cannot base his being wrong about sold  vs shipped on ulterior motvies. Companies have NEVER given sold thru to customer numbers since I've been here....almost 3 years. NEVER. I don't even think it's EVER happened unless very extenuating circumstances.

 

@heruamon

Greenberg "LOL"ed at our 3-day total. MS just reported on a 10-day total. 3 days =|= 10 days. Our 10 day shows 1.3M, and MS says over 1M. I don't understand how you can possibly confuse the two. :P

You evidently didn't bother to read my comments, as it wasn't directed at the VGC numbers,....oh nvm...

Sorry, I was responding to this post:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3754501

ethomaz was commenting at how our numbers are currently higher than MS', and implying that when Greenberg LOL'ed, it was because we were overtracking it like we currently are.

Then you said "1.3 million is less than 475k...wow." As I understand it, you were implying that vgc's numbers said 475k, and MS' were 1.3 million. Because when he LOL'ed we were saying 475k, so you're challenging that argument by saying that MS' are 1.3M and that it isn't less than vgc's numbers but more.

Am I correct about your dialogue? That is correct English interpretation of what was said.

This is why I responded and said that 1.3M is a ten day total, and 475k is a three day total. Not only did they not co-exist, seeing as how 10 days just passed only yesterday, but those are both vgc estimated total. Neither of those numbers came from MS.