Lostplanet22 said:
1) If my memory is correct their was not much complaining and their were only two flaws mentioned on the forums The game felt slow compared to Halo 2 and the map were not that great compared to Halo2..Honestly their was not much else to complain about considering Halo 3 = Halo 2 extra's |
1) I guess you're right. Still, anyone will just complain about anything and can't seem to adapt to change. What do I say to these people? Go back to Halo 3 if you think it's so great (I can't say go back to Halo 2... well you can on PC, but still). It's as simple as that, no? No one's forcing you to play a game you don't even like anyways!
2) tl;dr, but you don't have to play 13.000 games on Halo 3 to figure out that most of the things he said at the bottom are true. Seems to me that Bungie should have just called the game Reach and only Reach, not Halo Reach. Yes, Halo 3 was definitely more "Halo" and the maps were a lot better. About the bloom/AA issues, it's just like the melee system in 3 at first (it was abusive!!). Anyways, the game just released two months ago, I say we give Bungie a chance to figure out ways to fix the AA abuses and all. Halo 3 wasn't perfect either when it launched!
And this thread is about BO and Reach, not which Halo game was better, right? 
Random game thought :
Why is Bionic Commando Rearmed 2 getting so much hate? We finally get a real game and they're not even satisfied... I'm starting to hate the gaming community so f****** much...







