A203D said:
Thats a fair point about what people expect. but remember theres been a few things reported like not being able to sit down, not being able to recognise people of darker skin tones clearly, a lag between the player and the on screen response, and not being able to wear baggy clothes or skirts, and a need for specific levels of lighting. so imo yes people shouldnt expect to get everything so cheap, but still is justifiable for kinect to have those problems mentioned and still charge consumers more then triple the production cost?? this is a debatable issue and i dont agree that the cost is justified because of those problems, however R&D costs are also important to consider and i have no information about that unfortunatly. |
I don't think features or flaws matter here. Its all business really, supply and demand to be exact...which is proportional to competition.
Wii came out and was the only cat in town and sold a boatload at a profit.
Fastforward to 2010 and Microsoft managed to carve a unique position for Kinect, which is their greatest success with Kinect. They can sell it at 149 as it appears that no onther device/console can give the same experience as Kinect.
Sony kinda dropped the ball I think as they didn't differentiate themselves from the Wii, other than trying to sell their motion controls to a more adult crowd.
So as things stand it looks like consumer choices are:
Wii/Move VS Kinect
Hence MS can really charge whatever they want for it as no one else has convinced the public that the same experience can be bought with their console/motion controls.
As a personal opinion, 299 for xbox and kinect is a great deal. 149 for Kinect alone is not a great deal, but it isnt a rip off. Its priced just right...







