By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
NinjaguyDan said:
Kasz216 said:

So, you are suggesting that because they are against all regulation of the internet...

they would be for a bill that passes regulation of the internet.

Peculiar.

The exact reason they are against Net Nuetrality is that they don't like the fact that the government could tell internet companies what they could do with the internet, because it would lead to something exactly like this bill.


The very reason I support Net Neuteality is because total fucking idiots are against it.

Those very same idiots are totally unaware of spell check.

Net... Neuteality?

I could be wrong but I don't think that's how it's spelled either.

Just sayin... getting on someone about their spelling on an internet message board message that was typed up in a few seconds and then following that up by spelling the exact same word wrong.... and calling that person a "total fucking idiot" (good luck with the mods on that one if they stumble by this.)

I mean, that's just a trainwreck.   Guess you don't spell check tiny internet posts either... because you know.  That would be stupid and a complete waste of time.

Anyway... like I said, i'm for laws for it.  However I could see how people would think that consumer demand for that not to happen could be enough to prevent it from happening.

Though I think the one flaw in that currently is that we let phone and internet companies own cable and basically set up pocket monopolies that are only competing against inferior wireless plans.