Kasz216 said:
So, you are suggesting that because they are against all regulation of the internet... they would be for a bill that passes regulation of the internet. Peculiar. The exact reason they are against Net Nuetrality is that they don't like the fact that the government could tell internet companies what they could do with the internet, because it would lead to something exactly like this bill. |
Let's see, net-neutrality is the government attempting to protect consumers from potentially consumer un-friendly practices of ISPs, so ISPs can't decide which websites their customers have access too. It is the exact OPPOSITE of this bill, where the government want to restrict access to websites.
So you would support allowing your ISP to dictate which sites you can visit?







