Rath said:
It's a bit more precise than that. It's kind of like working out the molecular structure of the liquid, doing the math to find out whether its flammable and then tossing a match in it. And of course they could find something new, theres just no reason to believe that that something new is going to somehow destroy the human race. |
Which again, has often led to disasterous results.
I point back to my earlier example of the Tychonic model.
The Tychonic model was mathmatically sound, it was as far as "proven" as anything could be without having direct proof.








