Rainbird said:
kowenicki said:
disolitude said:
Rainbird said:
disolitude said:
Not too bad for 5 year old hardware and 4 year old hardware with a 6 year old video card.
Im curious though, how does the 3D mode run on consoles?
320x240 per eye? lol
|
Just read the article. 
|
Thanks!
So 360 runs 720p/2 per eye and then scaled back to 720p.
PS3 runs at ???? resolution which is stuck in to a 1280x1470 frame and then cut in half for each eye. (the standard HDMI 1.4 3D gaming resolution)
Apparently 360 version runs smoother but thats not surprising considering that the game in 2D runs smoother as well...
|
so the 3d version is better on 360?
|
Indeed. The PS3 version can't keep up with the framerates in 2D and the same holds true for 3D.
|
Im pretty sure this will be the case for any game which has 3d and wasn't built from the ground up with 3D in mind. When devs add 3D at the last minute they pretty much just unload all this extra work on to the video card...I doubt they have the time or budget to optimize the Cell to help out with 3D processing.
A game like Killzone 3 should yield much better results for the PS3.
