naznatips on 08 November 2010
| gekkokamen said: ^Whatever, it's not part of it because of that example with the "1960's " , that's clear enough. Nobody in real life talks about a decade thinking year 1 to 10. Right now we're living in the 10's, and 2010 is part of the 10s, not part of 00's . The end. |
There's more than one way to view a decade. Just because that's not the way to view the "00s" doesn't mean it's not a way to view a legitimate major decade. 2001 to 2010 was the first decade of the new millennium, which is pretty big. Even if it wasn't what you call the "00s."
