Torillian said:
I'm not hiding behind legalities, I'm telling you that you're acting entitled when you aren't at all. Did it suck when 360 got a bunch of GTAIV DLC exclusive? Obviously, but I didn't talk about how Rockstar had betwrayed their customers. I bought a game and that's it, there was no promise of every piece of content relating to that game being accessible to me explicitly or otherwise. On your second paragraph: Find a quote from me talking about being betrayed because of exclusive DLC and I'll be quite impressed. Otherwise responding to my response with some bullshit generalization about what I'd say in the opposite situation is just that: bullshit. |
It's hard to debate you when you contradict yourself in the first sentence.
It amazes me that some people defend exclusive DLC by hiding behind semantical BS of whether or not people who buy a game are "entitled" to all the content. So tell me, if you truly believe this, why does it suck for anybody to get exclusive DLC? Why would it suck if we weren't all promised every piece of content for the game in the first place?
I'll cut to the gist of my argument: Just because they can do it, doesn't mean it's right, or I have to like it. Tell me how you disagree with that.









