johnsobas said:
Kasz216 said:
Teo said:
Fact: American extreme liberals = closer to a moderate in the rest of the world. Do some research on politics around the world, the U.S media does not define the world.
Just because you post a lot on politics in a form does not make you a guru.
Oh, sorry that I didn't read your previous post but I'm pretty sure I was not even talking to you when I entered this thread. If you think attacking someone's intelligence as a conversation starter, than you need to no longer wonder why you can't get laid. You are not correct, you are politically correct, which means you are always wrong.
I am not an extreme liberal, I'm an "independent," but I don't let a label define me. I will always vote liberal simply because they are the only ones that create less wars and to some extent progress human equality. This is more important than money, the economy, and traditions but apparently no thinks so because their actions shows the contrary. If I was going to start a business, I would hire a republican.
|
Riiiiight. Yet you think there are no extreme liberals.... and gerrymandering only helps republicans.
Your doing a pretty crappy job at being independant.
As for the less wars thing... you must have a short memory... lets look at the major conflicts since WW2.
WW2 - Democrat
Korean War - Democrat
Vietnam - Democrat
Desert Storm - Republican
Bosnia - Democrat
Yugoslavia - Democrat
Operation Desert Fox and other bombings of Iraq - Democrat (The ones under clinton, some people claimed he did it just to help his approval ratings"
Afganistan War - Republican
Iraq War - Republican
Final tally Democrats 6 - Republicans 3. Outside of the final Iraq war, i'd doubt any of those wars would of been avoided... and even Iraq only happened because of a few specific people in charge. If Clinton was president instead of Bush we probably would of been at war with Korea before they got the nukes.
Not to menion that to even start a war you need congressional approval which means both sides agree on it.
Hilary Clinton in the primaries was calling for the invasion of Iran... and Barak O bama said we'd basically invade Pakistan without their approval to get at Al Queda.
There is no real "anti-war" party.
|
come on now the republican party is different then it used to be. I would probably be a republican 20-30 years ago and before, but i can't bring myself to be one in today's politics.
|
How would that be a defense for the huge number of wars the democrats have started? I mean clinton had 3 major military incursions.
Two of which we used cluster bombs in.
