Kasz216 said:
Teo said:
Kasz216 said:
Teo said:
I disagree, gerrymandering helps the conservatives gain the vote of the uneducated.
|
You can disagree... but your disagreement apears to be devoid of any actual facts, reasoning or arguement.
As you've not provided any.
I can disagree the sun is needed for life on earth. I'd guess people would want that backed up by some kind of arguement though.
|
My post came out glitched so I just did a quick edit to point out my stance.
Gerrymandering sole purpose is for electoral purposes, this is how we get the extreme conservatives elected to the house. There are no extreme liberals in the house because there is no such thing as a major minority of liberals living in the countryside of each states. This is how the tea pary came to be, there will never be such a movement from the left in the United States. Certain situations and unequalities create communism, we are way passed that.
|
You don't think there are any extreme liberals in the house?
What? Dennis Kusinich doesn't even rank in the top 100 for most liberal.
As for the Tea Party coming from the "extreme conservative gerymander states".
Why is it that the Tea Party Candidates that got into congress defeated Democratic incumbents? It's your opinion that the Democratic incumbants were the winners of "extremely republican districts."
Are you even remotely paying attention to anything political?
|
Dennis Kusinich an extreme liberal? Please spare me, you problably heard that on fox news.
I said Democrats incumbents were the winners of extremely republican districs? Really? Where? Your ass is blue, see I can make things up too.
It's obvious you think you know everything about politics, you don't.
