Rath on 01 January 2008
| mrstickball said: But more effort is going into what makes the XBLA list - old or new. For $5 we get multiplayer-enabled console games, whereas VC players do not. Classics are classics when you consider the top-tier VC games with OOT, and XBLA's SOTN - you don't need more. But when it comes to those multiplayer games, why not get the extras? I mean, we get all kinds of goodies for Sega games like Sonic 1/2, Streets of Rage, Fatal Fury Special, and such. Why doesn't Nintendo ask for the same quality MS demands? |
More effort always goes into new games than ports but that does not mean higher quality.
I agree that it would be nice to get the extras but I maintain that through their library alone Nintendo has higher quality and quantity than XBLA.
