"Are you seriously asking how one draws the line between a child being used for sex and two consenting adults deciding to have sex? It's not like Christianity embraces the whole issue either, plenty of harassment from them too. I don't think religious acceptance is going to be easy. But if you protest that gay people don't deserve to live, don't be surprised that yours is being perceived as an extremist's view. Christians having the same ambitions are perceived the same way, and giving a bad name to Christianity."
That was one sample for you. If you don't agree with it, just get another example. Again, how to do you think sex with a 16 year old is illegal and with 18 years not illegal? How do you draw that line? Don't the 16 years girls understand and have physical capability of having it?
"Don't do yourself the disservice of giving that example. Unless you really view yourself and the others belonging to Islam as an army. An army isn't associated with peace. Soldiers take orders so more the pity if you were born into this army without ever evaluating anything for yourself."
Why not? A person enters into the Army of his own choice. Again, who said an Army isn't associated with peace? The basic purpose of an Army is to protect the country, don't you know it? And protecting the country brings peace, isn't it?
The question here was about non-Muslims, not people who left it. Like I am. Criticising some of your views now, not agreeing with them, not seeing them as pure, just etc.
Can you tell me why the BBC RJ was suspended for preaching false death news of the Queen as a joke? When Prophet Muhammad (Peace be Upon Him) is drawn as a terrorist while he preached peace in his entire life, the cartoonist is not punished and it is viewed as a freedom of speech thing. Do you see the double standard Muslims are victim of?
If you want to criticize, you have to be constructive. What is so constructive in criticizing the Prophet falsely?
Also, the question of why the Quran is perfect, but the other texts aren't also begs the question also. of how that would work.
Because history says so and so do the experts. Read how the Quran was preserved and how the Bible was not. The Bible's manuscript is found in Greek and not in its original language. You can't even be sure if that translation is ok. The last manuscript in Greek is found after 200 years of Jesus' (Peace be upon him) alleged crucifiction.
But Quran was preserved right from the time of Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) and it was memorized by thousands of his companions. From then on, Millions of Muslims memorize the Quran. So, if you burn down all the books of Quran, these people can bring the texts back without even a single mistake. Memorizing those 6000 verses is not a simple task, no other religion has such thing. Why, because Allah says in the Quran, I have brought down the Quran and I will preserve it. So he is preserving it in this way.
