By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ZechsMerquise on 31 October 2010
Edit Thread
TX109 said:
ZechsMerquise said:
TX109 said:

it's not looking good for Goldeneye(at ;east imo). i may pick this up first. kinsa dissapointed about only 5 on 5, but hey, everything else is really cool!

5 vs 5 worked well on MWR, I know The Conduit did 6 vs 6 but that was quite glitchy and buggy. I'm still picking up Goldeneye as well as COD:BO, I just know which I'll be spending most of my time with. I think they should have delayed Goldeneye, as with only 4 vs 4, no voice chat and a lack of co-op, it is clearly not going to be as complete a package as COD:BO.

I've not been this hyped for a game in a long time. I can't wait, I knew Treyarch wouldn't let us down.

PS: TX109, I love your knitted Link!

 

ill no doubt be getting both, but the question is which one first(since ill only have the money for one)?". im really looking at BO. im almost positive that Goldeneye will have a much better single player(even with the lack of online co-op) so there is one point fo goldeneye.

i have never played MWR so i wouldnt know about 5 vs 5 or aby of it's online, but i did play W@W like a fiend and, enen though that was only 4 vs 4, i had a ton of fun with that. Plus, the game has Zombies soooooo........

btw, thanks

If I had to choose one to get first I'd go for Black Ops all the way. I have spent over 200 hours on WAW and over 275 on MWR and can assure you there's a lot to them. I'm getting both on release, but Goldeneye will be more for the single player campaign and nostalgia. Black Ops has a lot more going for it, especially if you have friends you play with regularly - I can't wait for the Zombies.