ZechsMerquise said:
5 vs 5 worked well on MWR, I know The Conduit did 6 vs 6 but that was quite glitchy and buggy. I'm still picking up Goldeneye as well as COD:BO, I just know which I'll be spending most of my time with. I think they should have delayed Goldeneye, as with only 4 vs 4, no voice chat and a lack of co-op, it is clearly not going to be as complete a package as COD:BO. I've not been this hyped for a game in a long time. I can't wait, I knew Treyarch wouldn't let us down. PS: TX109, I love your knitted Link! |
I don't think co-op works for GoldenEye in terms of the context of the game.You're a lone agent compared to being apart of a military unit or partnered up. You could have it just to have it but would it make sense in the end? However what I would have liked is this Allies system that Black Ops is getting. It's unknown if GE will get any patching as well. Which will be more secure from hacks as well will be interesting to see because there is a good chance Black Ops on Wii could have hosted servers. Those are the two big issues that bother me. I would like it if was 5v5 instead of 4v4 but I've never really played 4v4 so not sure how much of a negative it really is.
Advertising budget will determine I think how well GE does in the end. Seeing no signs of one though at the moment.
