reidlosdog said:
Yes!!! With this logic, I can do anything!!! I could easily sell anything I want at half the cost because my product is better!!! Microsoft doesn't "have" to spend that money. They already make bank on the existing sales. You put in money to get money, and you invest in things that show a lot of possibilities for growth. If you believe the product will do well, then you invest in it. Show me a product that has made more money than it's competitors and didn't have as much commercial time as it's competitiors in it's infancy. What comes to mind? Minecraft? That's about it. When something actually makes it to a commercial (or into commercialization), it means that it has gone under rigorous analyzing and has been seen as well worth the cost (when speaking of commercializaiton on a national scale, local economy's differ when it comes to this idea). I have a feeling your going to understand this as much as euphoria. So, to make it more simple, let's wait 1 week, yeah, 1 week, and tell me what you think about kinect sales. |
You failed to grasp the point. They certainly spent so much because they felt they had too. As example, since you want one, Kinect will probably never sell more than Wii. But Nintendo didnt spend so much on marketing. Why you ask. Because Nintendo was confident their product would work without investing that much in marketing.
Theres could be literally hundreads of examples since no company spend that much marketing for one product. 500 millions, dont you realise thats enormous.







