By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
TheRealMafoo on 29 October 2010
Edit Thread
theprof00 said:
TheRealMafoo said:

What are gay rights? When did they get rights I don't have? There are no Gay Rights, Woman's Rights, Minority Rights, or any other sub group rights. There are Human rights, and we all get them.

In my perfect world, there would be no issues with respect to sexual preference and the federal government, because the federal government would have no laws where it mattered.

There would be no marriage tax credit. No recognition of marriage of any kind, because there would be no need to care if your married or not, and to who your married too. The Federal government would be indifferent to the concept of marriage.

For me, the party that closest maps that view, is Libertarian. The current movement that is closest to my views, is the tea party.

"X Rights" is the name of the movements to restore the rights therein, we do not all get them. Once upon a time, women couldn't own property, vote, etc. Same for blacks. Doctors in some places can refuse treatment of gays.

I don't know if you disagree or not..I'm having a lot of trouble understanding your viewpoints.

My viewpoint is men should have the right to marry men. But it's not a gay right. I am not gay, and I should have that right as well.

It's a human right. Currently in the US, there are many restrictions our government has put on us that our constitution affords us. We need to fight to remove those restriction, but not in the name if "X" group.

If I lived in a time where blacks could not vote, I would be fighting to correct that. Because as an American, the constitution affords him that right. I would have not fought for the 14th amendment. I don't think it's needed. The Constitution says all men are created equal, and a black man is a man. No need for a black right.

It's a subtle difference, but it means a lot. As long as you have subgroups fighting for power, you will always have division. I want everyone fighting for all rights for all people.

This is the main thing I have against the liberal party. Class warfare. If someone has something better then you, it must be at your expense. This is just not the case. It breeds hate. If we could all fight for everyones lives to be better, we would live in a much better world.

I want a poor man to be richer, but I also want a rich man to be richer. Why can't we desire all peoples lives to improve there positions in life, and not just pick a group to hate, and a group to want to help? Makes no sense to me.