Baalzamon on 26 October 2010
Ok, so you're using this whole satisfied thing saying it is the developers job to satisfy the customer. I think this is sort of a flawed argument. When you are purchasing a game, while you may be paying to have a good experience with the game, the developer is not promising that you will get this with their game. I'm not necessarily pushing that this whole added cost for used buyers thing goes through, but the argument against it should not be based on satisfaction.
Money can't buy happiness. Just video games, which make me happy.
