Alby_da_Wolf said:
This apparent but false MS self confidence about letting people try has already been debunked contless times, both in this thread and in others: people tries Kinect in MS' booths for a limited time in a standard environment, while at home they'd use it for more time in environments varying from home to home. Reviewers would be able to test Kinect for a longer time and find possible real world glitches or short games longevity. When you buy a car, trying it jourself is important, but a review made by a competent motoring journalist is important too, as he will be able to try the car longer and also in limit conditions, to tell you, for example, how safe it is in emergency manoeuvres. And "casuals" aren't a new alien race, they are common people, plain and simple, even if they don't usually read car magazines, for example, they most often ask friends and even buy mags just for the occasion when they have to buy a car. Here, I was the n-th person to write this arguments, I'm sure many did it better than me before, but each time there will be somebody that tries again to make people believe that not having reviews is better, and also pretending that nobody ever debunked it. At least this time you wrote the right thing: not allowing reviews is good and smart for MS. Not for users. BTW, would you buy a Yugo if Oprah said it's a good car? |
No, i read no reviews for just about anyhting. To much bad info out there for everything. I get hands on with the items i want to buy. Bought a wii after someone brought theirs over to my house and I could play for an hour. Bought my tv because we use them in my resturaunt and I could see them in action. Bought my car because my mom had the previous model and it was great for her. The idea that a hands on is not a true experience is just false. It either worked in that 10-15 minutes for you or it didn't. You either had fun and wanted more or you didn't. its not magically going to change in a few minutes. It either detected your voice and movements or it didn't. Casuals are far more likely to trust the word of Oprah and Beiber than a game journalist they do not know. You dont have to be an expert in a feild to have trust in what you pitch, You just have to have the trust of your fans, which I am sure Oprah and beiber do. Who will average joe know more about, Oprah or someguy from IGN?
And read the post above for the different conditions its been demoed under, not all perfect and rosy. If you really do not think it works, why not go try it it out and tell us what you think? You have that option.







