Seece said:
akuseru said:
Jadedx said:
Snesboy said:
kibebr said:
I think Microsoft is RIGHT!!!!
Take a look at the past: Introduced a marketing video about Knectic 3 years before it launch, just to get attention of the market and keep some momentum...
Knectic got everybody attentions, and deserve it, it´s really innovative.
What´s happening now: people start to think and put things together, understand Knectic limitations, etc..etc.. so the hype must be secure at least until cristhmas...
I believe knectic 1.0 is very limited to some type of movements, so, you will handle many games with same gestures, LOL..
go Microsft, keep rich and growing, you brought LIVE and gamers got better online services, now you bring Knectic and make toher companies MOVE. :)
MS is doing great job innovating on gamming, I respect a lot that!
|
I felt like I was reading MS PR when I read this post...
|
Except that he keeps spelling Kinect wrong, and he says that Kinect is very limited. I bet you think anything positive about Kinect is PR.
|
Sorry for nitpicking, but some of Microsoft's PR people have actually called Kinect for Kinetic (or something like that, MULTIPLE times), so it's not that they can't misspell their own product's name.
|
Link? I've more than likely seen more Kinect videos than you and I've never heard anyone say Kinectic.
|
Now, what a surprise that YOU came running along asking for a link. I'll see what I can find, but to be honest, I don't really care if I please you or not. I got better stuff to do than search around the net for an old link. I know what I heard. Now try to discredit me all you want, I don't care. I simply remember it because someone on a forum pointed out that Kinetic was a game for the EyeToy and that he [MS guy] was calling Kinect for Kinetic.
- "But you need to back up your statement with links!"
- NO, I don't.
At least they did it in the (most likely proved fake) take-down notice sent to Destructoid.
