Fame_Mcswagg on 23 October 2010
leatherhat said:
evolution_1ne said:
Fame_Mcswagg said:
Call me crazy but I see Killzone as a casual FPS. I like what I'm am seeing. There was no strategy involved in the last game, the maps were too small, there was too many players, all you had to do is chuck grenades and you got a ton of kills. It looks a lot better to me.
|
see first I was going to bold the no strategy part but your whole post reaks of FAIL
the lager player count wasn't forced on you via modifiable servers, you can play killzone 2 online and never play a 32 player game at all.
run along now, back to call of duty with you.
|
Don't be so snobby. Its no way to get people interested in a series you like so well.
|
Don't worry he couldn't sway my opinion either way, killzone 2 was an average game and this game looks better. I purchased Killzone 2 and got my money worth. I see no reason why Killzone 3 won't deliver the same
I'm not martin luther king. I don't have a dream. I have a plan
Sell a man a fish you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish you just ruined a perfect business opportunity.
We didn't emerge out of the stone age because we ran out of stones. Its time to be proactive not reactive.