ZenfoldorVGI said:
Name some. Plus screenshots and IQ comparisons. That's my opinion. :P Matter of fact, most HD games, including The Witcher, would barely play at sub HD resolutions with that setup. I'm talking about playing games at 1280x720 30fps here. Which is what most 360/PS3 games do, especially the ones that look amazing. Everything is a huge bottleneck. 2gb of DDR2, wtf, lol? That's barely gonna run Windows. 2GB is perfectly fine. I've never seen a review bottlenecked by that amount of RAM. I have that amount and my usage has never gone into pagefile when playing Supreme Commander, Half-life 2 or SC2 at 1280x1024 High settings. Specs are not interchangable between consoles and PC. Due to game and OS and code optimization, I'd guess games run about 3x better on a console with similar specs. I just built what I feel is a current gen gaming PC and I spend about 2000 dollars. Better gaming that console? Oh hell yeah. But I used quality components. Why would you want to buy shit just to scrap by. That PC you just built has been obsolete for years and won't play current games worth a shit. But it does equal a PS3/360 IMO. That's what I was aiming for. Obviously I used rubbish and cheap components to do it, but so did MS for the 360 until recently. It can't play current games, but that wasn't the objective. If I was to build a gaming PC kit would be more like $600 (X4 945/HD6870/4GB RAM). How on earth did you spend $2000? |