Seece said:
Hapimeses said:
Seece said:
It's pretty clear cut to me, but then I knew certain people would be pissed due to those high scores not bolstering the line up.
The list is for games that are built from the ground up with the motion controller set up (or eyetoy). It's not difficult to get. I've already said these lists arnt based on overall SW for the controllers or quality of library, I just want to track how the content being specifically made for these controller schemes pans out, there is no need for your incesent whining and condescending tone, and as you may have noticed, I have no idea what most of those move games are, so if you want me to remove the ones you don't think fit in the same vein as heavy rain, then I suggest you stop telling me too without actually naming them. thanks.
|
Right, so you're turning to passively insulting me. Thanks. No, really, very kind of you.
All I asked were some questions because I didn't understand your choices -- and I still don't; they still seem arbitrary and without any significant point -- and I provided some links to games I thought may help. Then, when you explained yourself, I suggested two games be removed from your list (one of which there is a decent counter point to, as listed above). However, you seem to have taken offense to this and turned on me. In particular, this shows you're not even reading what I'm writing to you:
'then I suggest you stop telling me too without actually naming them'
Did you read my post you replied to? I did name them. Both of them, in fact. Don't start making accusations and demands without reading the posts you are referring to first.
Really, chill. Take a deep breath. I have no agenda here. I actually came here to give a hand where I could, and I've had my head bitten off by an oversensitive poster.
In short: I'd rather you didn't project your fears upon me. I'm neither pissed nor concerned about high scores or low scores or whatever else is bothering you. All I was chatting about was what I saw as an odd distinction that you seemed to create all by yourself to make a point I did not understand.
I shouldn't have bothered asking. You clearly have an agenda here, and anything that goes against it, even when it is not aimed as such, will be shouted down.
|
I'm perfectly calm and explained myself pretty well the first time, I could have done without your opinion on whether you thought it was a good idea or not, and yes, you come across as condescending if I'm honest. Neither did I bite your head off, you're going a bit OTT.
I have no agender, nor do I need to "shout you down", I explained myself which is more than I had to do, if you don't like it then I'm afraid you'll have to lump it!
|
If I came across as condescending to you, then I apologise: it wasn't my intent.
However, I didn't give an 'opinion on whether I thought it was a good idea or not', regardless of what you protest. This is the second time you've misrepresented me. Again, I question if you even read my posts. I merely asked why you did it as you did, and whether you thought two lists for PS3 games would be worthwhile to present a full picture.
With that taken into account, I find myself unable to accept your 'no agender' comment in light of your combatative answers and inability to read what I'm writing. You clearly are reading things into my posts that aren't there.
So, with that in mind, I'm bowing out.
