Calmador said:
I agree, how can people be so ignorant? |
There's no ignorance in believing a business shouldn't try and manipulate its press to be favourable. Kow's point is very weak IMHO. It's like saying only let someone who likes cheesy horror films review cheesy horror films, or someone who likes heavy metal review heavy metal. In a sense that's the worstapproach as it's a simple self confirming closed circle. The whole point of general reviews is to provide different views and allow you to guage stuff outside your knowledge.
Why shouldn't I, a seasoned gamer, get to read reviews by seasoned gamers of what they thought of Kinect titles? That's useful for me and allows me to get a feel for how I might find the titles myself.
If the games are fun then they'll get decent scores. Will some Wii and Move titles have been panned those that are good from a more traditional gamer aspect aren't, and I don't see why MS should behave in a way to try and exlude a section of their potential purchasing community.
There are a lot of general reviews in every medium, with games being no different, and Kinect title's shouldn't be ducking them, particularly if Nintendo and Sony titles aren't. An even playing field is better for the consumer. And we should, as the buying gamers, be arguing for what benefits us - clear and consistent reviews - vs what is better for the business.
I want to be able to read someone like Ebert's take on Transformers as much as his take on The Third Man, and the same applies in gaming.
Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...