Garland said:
|
I suppose that depends on your definition of "real gamer". Seems to be most of the controversy around that these days . . . as far as "hardcore" gamers go, I think we'll have to wait and see about what they'll do. "Casual" gamers are a whole different matter. Using a friend of mine as an example, she got the Wii and plays it on and off a few times a month. Sure, the game is Wii sports, but when I showed her Halo for the first time she couldn't even move and shoot at the same time. Her coordination for video games isn't that good, which is understandable given that she's never played either a shooter or even a game that requires two joysticks.
But she's great at Wii Sports bowling, and in the end it came down to the accessibility, ease, and addictiveness of playing with the Wiimote. Without a controller, for gamers like her it mind as well be a perfect match-- she can play the game without needing to worry about any confusing joysticks or buttons at all. Its all intuitive, assuming that it works anyway. Thats the kind of game non-gamers will play. Thats the kind of people Microsoft is targetting. Thats the kind of person who will buy it and love it, regardless of if there are that many good games.

GOTY Contestants this year: Dead Space 2, Dark Souls, Tales of Graces f. Everything else can suck it.







