And thats the difference between Microsoft and Sony

[SpartenOmega117]

disolitude said:

SpartenOmega117 said:

disolitude said:

Oh please kid, you don't know your gaming history.

When Sony started Sega and Nintendo were working hard on making games while Sony blew rediculous amounts of money on commercials and hype. The ad campaign that Final Fantasy 7 had was bigger than segas whole year advertising budget.

Sony would love to be in the position Microsoft is in today as far as marketting is conerned...

why are you trying to change the topic? did i ask wheter or not sony wanted to be in microsofts position? I just asked which one you guys perferred more. Thanks for the history lesson btw :)

See but you can't do that. Ask a question based on a statement that is biased and not correct and then expect people to answer with simple option 1 or 2.

We got Crackdown 2, Alan Wake, Halo REach and Fable 3 from microsoft this year. Hows that not investing in games?

I think you are taking this wayy to seriously. Im not trying to insult anyone. We can argue who has better games whatever. But we can't deny that sony does have more 1st party studios and therefore able to release more games. Its a fact. Just look at next years lineup for PS3. Sure microsoft has its games too but they obviously rely on a smaller number of games and then do a huge marketing push for each of them. And thats not bad either. I don't know why you turning this into an argument or why you are taking this to heart.