Mr Khan on 18 October 2010
| rocketpig said: Question for a few of you out there: how do you rationalize pro-choice/anti-death penalty or pro-life/pro-death penalty? Without an incredible amount of moral maneuvering, it doesn't make sense to me. I'm kind of in the middle (very pro choice, mildly against the death penalty) but only because of financial costs, really. On a morality level, how do you split it down the middle? |
Not that hard, actually.
Pro-choice/anti death penalty rationalization: "Life for everyone who is actually alive"
Pro-Life/Death penalty rationalization: "Give everyone a chance to live, but if they blow that chance..."
Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.
