reidlosdog said:
http://gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2010/10/18/fallout-3-dlc.aspx
As I sit here I realize, multi-platform games have loved the 360 for quite some time now. It was only recently that Steam went head over heels with Sony, but of course no remembers when Steam bashed the hell out of the PS3.
Anyone that says 360 is anti developer, tell that to all the developers who make bank off of the 360.
http://gamrfeed.vgchartz.com/story/82425/americas-preorders-chart-16-october-2010-fallout-new-vegas/
Long-term sales for multi-platforms do quite well on the 360 when compared to the PS3:
Modern Warfare 1 & 2, Assassin's Creed, Oblivion, Fallout 3, Grand Theft Auto IV, Read Dead Redemption, Medal of Honor(new one), Rock Band 1 & 2, Dragon Age, BioShock 2, Madden (all), BFBC2, BFBC1, and many many more.
I will concede that soccer games do do better on the PS3, but I'm pretty sure that's about it.
And on top of that, XBL actually has games on demand, which Sony has already stated they will never have because they use "Blu-Ray" discs. Yeah, well what about all of the multi-platforms?
Companies do have to pay for a DLC fee in order to get their DLC on the XBL, XBL sells far more DLC then PSN.
To say that the 360 doesn't help developers is insane. Again, the only reason Sony doesn't charge for a lot of stuff is because the CAN'T. If they did, they would literally be out of business. By not making as much money as their competition, they have barely been able to stay in the race. Only early THIS year did Sony actually start to make money, and that was after years of annual losses.
We are on VGCharts and we haven't even said all that yet? Glad I'm here.
|