TheRealMafoo said:
I agree with you. |
Actually I'm almost totally against it, but I'm persuaded that those that are in favour of it should first accept that it should be applied in its strictest and strongest form, and up to its extreme consequences, first on themselves, even more appropriate on those that cite the Bible, as it's written right there that those that judge the others will be judged with the same measure (Matthew 7:2). Executing an innocent should be considered deliberately killing him, if he was innocent, it's obvious that the evidences weren't totally sure and any doubt was ignored with the intention of executing the suspect at any cost, to exact an easy and unjust revenge. And every argument I read up until now minimizing the execution of innocents made me want to puke, as it was clearly inspired by a lust for blood and vengeance at any cost, even of killing innocents, I read in those arguments no lesser homicide intent than in those that they would want to prosecute.
This said, I could maybe accept death penalty only for the most heinous crimes and only if there is 100% certainty of guilt, 0% possibility of error and no mitigating circumstances at all.







