d21lewis said:
akuseru said:
d21lewis said:
Here's the analogy:
-Wii's online is just some skanky girl that will let you have sex with her. You probably won't feel satisfied afterwards and you may even feel a little guilty. Plus, you'll always wonder if she gave you a disease.
-PS3's online is that sweet girl you always wanted to have sex with. You can be her friend and eventually she gives you what you want. You feel pretty good about yourself and you're happy with her.
-360's online is that one really sexy girl that makes you spend your whole paycheck to get with her. To your surprise, she's REALLY good at having sex. Yeah, all you wanted was the sex but when you wake up in the morning, you find out that she made you breakfast, mowed the lawn, bought you a new iPod, and gave your dog a bath. You'd be happy just having more sex but considering that she's only with you for your money, it's not that bad since you're getting more out of the deal than you want.
-And PC is like a pornstar that has sex with you AND buys you nice things.
|
@bolded
That's actually good value. LIVE is NOT. No wait... Paying for sex? Man, your sad.... When you have to pay girls to come around your house and have sex, they're actually the WORST choice, not the BEST. So your analogy is crappy as hell..
I don't care what anyone says, PSN is better, because it's FREE. LIVE is NOT, and I also get this "optional" but mandatory feeling surrounding LIVE. I don't give a shit if you say it's optional, it's not if you want to enjoy your (bought and owned) games to the fullest. If you want to get something out of your X360, you have to pay for LIVE, so it's not optional, it's "optional".
|
In the end, if you buy a girl gifts, take her out to a movie, or dinner, you're paying for it. Don't fool yourself. And don't dare question my "game"-video or otherwise.
|
that's true, women cost a lot of money. and i don't quite follow you on the whole "game"-video thingy
