ConnorJCP said:
thranx said:
ConnorJCP said:
thranx said:
snfr said:
*looks at thread title*
Can somebody please explain me how this is a slap in the face to Sony?? I don't get it...
|
its a slap in the face because not only can MS charge for what should be free( according to some people), but they can increase the fee for it and people will still pay. Of course that is because its such a great service (at least in my opinion, worth every penny even after the increase.
|
Sony, Nintendo or any other company "can" do what ever they want. They just dont think it would be a wise business decision.
|
No, any company can only do what its customers want. How many ps3 owners will pay $50 a year to play online? How many would jump ship to the 360 than. Sony is still beholden to its stock holders, they have to turn profit or their stock holders will change things. They think its a bad decision cause they know they would loose customers.
|
Sorry but once again your wrong. CAN means is able to, Sony CAN easily issue a monthly fee, even fi the customers wont play online anymore. WOULD they, now thats a different story.
Get your words right.
|
No they are not able to. As you said, they thought it would be a bad business decision, ie they would not gain asmuch as they would loose, so they decided to go for free online, and advertised it that way. So they can't, especailly now that they took that stance and advertised free on line. Now there hands are tied, if they started charging now people could sue for false advertising. They are stuck where they are at until their next system when they charge for online right off the bat.
