By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
tuscaniman said:
Aldro said:
 

They wouldnt have answered that question. They would simply have done what they always do, refer to reviews.

Gamereactor has given Killzone 2 a 10/10 and Gears 2 a 9/10. So no mate, dont assure me anything xDD.

(Killzone 1 got 9/10, Gears 1 got 8/10)
Shocking maybe? xDD Or maybe god forbid, they enjoy Killzone over Gears?

I made a mistake :/? Theres a hot topic on Gamereactor forums and people are arguing about graphics so I just asked the damn editors for their opinion. Hows that wrong ^^. Curiosity and its their damn job. They know what they're talking about or atleast thats how I see it.


So you confirmed they are Killzone fanboys. Any questions regarding Killzone answered by them are going to be extremely exaggerated. Killzone 2 is not a 10. I don't care how much you like it. If you disagree compare Meta between the two games.

Now back to discussion of Gears of War.

Ohhhh, these lines are too damn funny, lol.

As I assume now that you are one of those guys who use meta scores to prove that one game is better than another one, I'll give you a tip: compare Halo:Reach to Modern Warfare 2 now, then tell me if everyone who rated Halo higher than MW2 is a Halo fanboy. I already see the double standard coming here...

BTW, Killzone 2 isn't a 10 for me, but it can be a 10 for someone else, it's an opinion!



2012 - Top 3 [so far]

                                                                             #1                                       #2                                      #3