Kasz216 said:
Which you know... doesn't actually mean anything. They did it to prevent a pointless lawsuit without merit. Any newstation would of done the same. Also, they didn't even argue that it wasn't illegal. They argued that it wasn't against section 448.102 of the whistleblower law. |
How do you come to the conclusion that it doesn't mean anything? It can certainly be used as precedent in future cases. It sets a chilling precedent that will affect others from becoming whistleblowers.