sapphi_snake said:
The thing about the huge fine thing. People dn't require the services of the Fire Department very often (for eaxmple I thankfully have never used their services in my life). So many would risk it, however the Fire Department would go bakrupt if they only charged people when they were called upon. As for the political thing, well if the Fire Department were privatised (like some politicians in America want to do in order to cut taxes, if I understand correctly), wouldn't stuff like this happen all the time? |
Well, no.
If you privatised the fire departments it would work just like it does now. It's just different groups would "Fight" for the cities contract every 5 years or so providing the best prices for the cities.
Can't say i've EVER heard anyone argue for switching to an "insurance based" plan like this for the country.
This is just the solution of "unincorporated" areas and smaller towns that don't have the resources or tax base to make their own firedeparments/ambulances other such services.
The cities with the stuff don't have the right to tax them. So it's either a subscription, or the town pays the city.
In this case... there might not even be a town. Hell, it might be there is but the city can't cover the entire unincorporated area he's in, hence why it needs to be a subscription based fee... cause they are too far away to reach most of the people.
Besides... this was a government run fire department.








