By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Wagram said:
Mr Puggsly said:

That was an interesting story. But that guy commenting is a moron.

They didn't let it burn for $75. They let it burn because he didn't pay the tax. The homeowner was greedy. His logic was he'll pay when he actually has a problem. He played the odds so he could save a few bucks and he lost his house. Simple as that.

At most, they should have put out the fire for a super inflated price. Like thousands of dollars.

Still doesn't make it right for them to watch it burn down. The fire dept is just as greedy IMO.

They had to watch it burn down... to prevent it from spreading.

Weird that's not just a mandatory part of your taxes.