Doobie_wop said:
daroamer said:
Doobie_wop said:
Mr Puggsly said:
Oh boy... this discussion is happening again.
The Kinect actually makes a skeleton of the body and can transfer the exact movement to a 3D model.
These Eyetoy games bascially just sense where motion is happening.
|
I'm not arguing which one is better, I'm just saying that the games are pretty much the same. Saying the Move is vastly different to the Wii mote and it's games is wrong, the same thing applies to the Eyetoy and Kinect.
|
How are they the same? I guess thats what I'm missing. Because they use body motion to affect things on screen? In that sense every game played with a controller is the same. Is is the genre that is similar? Because he was attacking things with his body then any game that uses a body is the same and shouldn't be downplayed constantly?
Why do people go gaga over Uncharted 2? It's basically just Tomb Raider.
Why even buy a PS3 at all? The games are basically the same as the PS2, right? Press buttons on controller, waggle your thumb and stuff happens on the screen. Waste of $300 bucks to do that on a PS3. Just that that DVD rip off Blu-ray. Worthless.
None of the games you showed me are the same experience as I had playing Kinect. I wasn't flinging my arms around hitting points on a screen, I was controlling my entire character and the in game camera with what I was doing and which way I was facing.
|
Overreaction much?
If your going that way with your argument, then I'll stop it here. It's also hard to take your Kinect impressions seriously, your history of 360 bias kind of dirty's them a little, especially when more professional means of media that I can trust haven't been so kind to the device. Don't take it as an insult, it's just my view on things.
|
Typical, don't have a good response so attack my character and impugn my judgement. Obviously I'm not professional enough to have an opinion on games.