Kasz216 said:
No... it's to actually stop it from happening by stopping the underlying principles. Think of derivitives like HIV. It can't kill you alone, but if you catch a cold.... watch out. Derivitivies are world wide... yet the countries that avoided the derivitives crash were largely financially healthy, fiscally conservative countries. The housing bubble is what triggered the derivitives collapse. The reason is because a lot of derivitives were morgages involving many different houses in different states... or in europe countries. (They actually had a near simaltanious housing bubble.) A giant devaluation of this caused those derivitives to fail, which led to people not having enough money to cover other derivitives. (Hence why they failed and the number of derivitives that failed wasn't only subprime morgages.) There is literally no way to prevent this from happening, except by stopping things like housing bubbles. The derivitives are out there already. They are worth more then 20 times the amount of money that actually exists. There is no regulations that can allow such a thing to be covered.
Stopping derivitives right now will hurt economic growth and cause a double dip in the recession. In reality we probably shouldn't regulate derivitives and instead take a defensive stance against bubbles, untiil we get far enough out that we can suffer another huge recession. |
Again, I agree that the housing bubble triggered the collapse, but it was NOT the underlying cause of it. The market itself is unsustainable. Having a market worth over $600 trillion when all of the world financial assets are worth less than $200 trillion is just not sustainable and is extemely fragile. This was going to collapse with or without the housing bubble.







