| Wiintendo said: i see 1 of two things happening with this thread
1. most will ignore investigation into the accusation, and continue enjoying military government propaganda such as Call Of Duty. 2. if there are to be a lot of responses, many will offer defense of this and most official propaganda masquerading as entertainment, continuing down their chosen path of woeful and willing ignorance.
I came across this link not too long ago that gives more detail on the Military Entertainment Complex Militainment: U.S. Military Propaganda in the News Media, Hollywood, and Video Games
This reminds me of the arbitrary uproar that the puppy video caused at a time when 1 million civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan are dead.
(the video evidence of human brutality concerning that 1 million plus number of people being available as well touches on the priorities of people.)
There's something very wrong with the majority of people.
|
I've read reports, of the US commiting attrocities in Vietnam, and other places, the Japanese commiting attrocities in Nan King. atrocities everywhere.
I still don't see how the movie can't be entertaining. It's a movie, it's fiction, the hero obviously didn't act realistic, I don't see what the problem with being entertained is. Call of Duty is a video game. If people go to Call of Duty for viewpoints on society today, then uhh... doesn't seem like the best source. So it serves its purpose as entertainment.
I mean Call of Duty isn't my cup of tea, Final Fantasy is, Neither is the Hurt Locker, Blade Runner and Crouching Tiger is. I just don't see the big deal if some people get their jollies from Hurt Locker type movies.
