raptors11 said:
whatever said:
raptors11 said:
richardhutnik said:
raptors11 said:
thranx said:
I think the problem is not with spreading wealth around, but giving wealth away to those who do not deserve it, and creating a cycle that rewards not working and punishes those who do work.
In my opinion wealth should be in the hands of those that work hard for it and those that can create new wealth/resources with what they have.
|
This. /Thread
|
Is the only exception to this is inheritance? Because of the sheer amount of money that is handed out, and it makes someone rich, certain individuals who didn't do squat have every right to get more money than they ever would know what to do with, they have every right to get every penny. Should we also abolish charity, and have it if individuals are not able to find meaningful work, they should be left to die of starvation?
|
So what you have a problem with inheritance? You think money shouldn't be able to be passed down to your children? I have no problem whatsoever with inheritance as long as people don't inherit a ton of money and use it as an excuse not to work. If I won the lottery I'd still stay in school and get a job.
And when did I anyone ever say anythin about abolishing charity? Charity is fine as long as donating to charity is optional. My dad is wealthy and he donates both to our local hospital and to a local foundation for mentally retarded people.
And should we leave people to die if they can't afford food? That's an interesting question, because I'm sure you'd be quick to say no but then I wonder how much have you donated to food banks or charities in your life? Do you personally help at all or do you think it should be up to the rich to provide food for the poor?
|
So is the government of a country supposed to do nothing while a large portion of it citizens starve to death?
|
Where in my post did I say that?
|
"And should we leave people to die if they can't afford food? That's an interesting question, because I'm sure you'd be quick to say no..."
I took that to mean that you wouldn't necessarily be quick to say no.
