scottie said:
@ underlined - that hurts a little. I'm an atheist (well, agnostic actually but everyone uses atheist to refer to agnosticism anyway, actual athieism is stupid) and I can guarentee that I have never gone out of my way to debunk a religion. Nor do I have a problem with religion, even if I do have a problem with some of the things that some people do in the name of their religion. I know a decent amount about the major religions through a combination of factors, non of which I entered into with malice in my heart. If you read the study carefully, you will see that the majority of the difference between number of questions answered correctly comes from the fact that Athiests know more about other religions, such as Buddhism than Christians do (in this study that is, please dont take that out of context) |
Im sorry. I didnt mean as an attack. What I meant is that atheists , because they see religion affecting several aspects of society, study those religions to be able to disprove them (debunk was the word I badly used) in case he needs to talk about it to anyone or defend a position he agrees with or wants to vote for.
There are atheists who live to debunk religion, but those are some and I dont want to generalize a group because of it.
Also there is the aspect that religions is dominant in society. Most people are, so I would think that for someone to call themselves atheists, they really need to study religions to be able to be sure (as they can be of course) that they are right. Society always pressures people into being whatever the majority is.
I hope I made myself understood. Again not trying to attack you or anything. 









