Reviewers have got to get rid of their 360 hard on

[Badassbab]

CGI-Quality said:

DirtyP2002 said:

What about Dead Rising 2?
PS3 version has massvie tearing and requires a HDD install. Still the same score.

What about Red Dead Redemption?
PS3 version looks way worse than the Xbox 360 version. Still the same score.

What about Resident Evil 5?
PS3 version looks worse than the Xbox 360 version. PS3 scored even higher.

 

Most of the multiplat games still look better on Xbox 360.

According to the Lens of Truth, PS3 versions of games take the crown in graphics a good amount of times, 360 in performance. Either way, it's pointless, the differences are so minor between most multiplats, the majority of the world cares very little.

OT: In my experience, I've seen some cases where they both aren't reviewd, but it's likely the exception instead of the rule.

It really is down to tastes. LoT tend to like Quincux AA as they like the 'soft' look it gives PS3 games (they like the lower res Quincux AA graphics of RDR on PS3). Price of Persia (2009) was rated as having better graphics on PS3 because of it. They thought 360 version looked too sharp even though it had better post processing effects and MSAA. There was the same thing about GTAIV. Even though the 360 version was a full on 720p with better framerate, IGN preferred the look of the Quincux AA PS3 version.

For me personally another big advantage for me to pick 360 multiplats over PS3 is the hardware upscaling to 1080p.