Reviewers have got to get rid of their 360 hard on

[theonewhoisme]

Rainbird said:

mundus6 said:

He has got a point though, some games are better on PS3 (like Castlevania) yet the PS3 version get equal score on both consoles from gamespot for example. Then look at Bayonetta and it gets 1 whole point more on 360. I know that they do play both versions but seriously; with most games the PS3 review feels rushed. This is only common from western reviewers though primarily UK and US reviewers.

I also heard that PS3 version of Castlevania looks better, so i will buy that.

It's not about what version of the game is better in reviews, not as long as the experience is essentially the same. Castlevania can get the same score for both platforms if it's the same experience (even with slight graphical differences), but the graphics in Bayonetta (PS3) were so bad that they affected the experience. When it makes a difference with the experience you get when playing the game, it's worth detracting from the score. If it doesn't affect the experience, no reason to hurt the score over it.

Castlevania has game effecting frame rate drop issues on the 360, so there goes your argument