theonewhoisme said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
theonewhoisme said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
hell no? i listen to the possitives about a game from other sites(cause i hate reading them) and think about the score. look at the game get the demo and wait for a friend to play it or buy before u do and watch them play and make a dession based on that.
for example: army of 2 the 40th day is in gridlock because 1 of my reveiwers Sam Lair says its not worth getting while the other reveiwer (my brother) says its a must buy and then my brother inlaws brother says its not worth getting but then theres the reveiw scores.
our top3 sites
Game informer 6-10
Xplay 4-5
Game Spy 4-5 i think
based on those scores its worth a buy or rent, but that reminds me of some Halo Reach scores. who in there right mind would give Reach a 7 out of 10? i'd personaly give the first 4 a 4 out of 10 if not lower but not Reach. its the best hands down.
long story short do your own research.
|
Who in their right mind would give reach a 7 out of 10? EVERYONE in their right mind, reach is just the same shit again, nothing new, nothing groundbreaking, and nothing great, nothing bad either, halo is like pokemon, gameplay is solid but just the same thing over and over again
|
considering i hate every HALO ever made other then REACH and HALO WARS i'm not sure if i agree, but thats the case with most games beatting a horse with a dead stick!
|
dead horse not dead stick
|
my bad
(sitts with egg on face)
that would be funny to see someone beatting a stick witha dead horse.
or horse with a dead stick. its ass backwards so its funny right?
