By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
drkohler said:
rocketpig said

And Chernobyl melted down because it was poorly maintained and was built far under any western specification for nuclear plants... 25 years ago.

No. Chernobyl type reactors use a completely different technology than "western" type reactors. In theory (simplified), western type reactors are "fail safe", you have to actively enable chain reactions (basically, if you walk away, the chain reactions stop). Chernobyl type reactors work exactly the opposite way, you have to actively control the chain reactions (if you walk away, the chain reactions exponentially increase).

I know that but that doesn't mean the Russian reactors weren't inferior to western reactors in many ways, the most obvious being a protective shell around the reactor itself to contain a meltdown. Chernobyl was essentially a building with a reactor in it and lacked many safeguards that were available at the time (including an opt-in on the reaction instead of an opt-out).




Or check out my new webcomic: http://selfcentent.com/