| Mendicate Bias said: I hate how you all make this political. This is pretty much the exact same situation that existed with the evolution debate a few decades ago. This is science, not opinion. The research has been done and the data is there. There is just as much a consensus in the scientific community that the current climate change is man made as there is that evolution is true. Most of the people giving their opinions here have probably read a single article or book on the subject and think their experts. How did this country go from being at the forefront of science and technology to banning stem cell funding, denying evolution, denying global warming and trying to make out the scientist as being some shady back door business man making millions off lying to the public. The funny thing is there is just as much money and jobs in "green"/renewable energy, if not more, as there is in oil. Its just the people that have the money now don't want to give it up. If we find a better source of energy a hundred years in the future we will probably run into the same problem again. All the billionaires that make their money off green energy will resist change. btw I'm not supporting Numonix, he's just as bad as the people denying man made climate change because their political party tells them to. |
There are thousands of scientist in the field of study that say it;s inconclusive at best. How many scientist say evolution is not true?
The reason we make it political, is because it is. There were thousands of doctors for years who said smoking was not bad for your health. Not because they thought it to be true, but because they were being paid well for it.
If you remove everyone who stands to profit from climate change being man man, or not man made, and then look at the opinions of the scientists left, you will see it's far from understood.
