rocketpig said:
Incredible. You sit there and insult anyone who disagrees with you, claiming ignorance on their part, while you're spewing misinformation and nonsense left and right. Way to go, champ. Why should we give a damn about the polar bears? I'm far more concerned with the possibility of frozen methane melting and destroying mankind within generations. Fuck the polar bears. To be against the burning of fossil fuels AND nuclear energy is cork-on-the-fork stupid. Renewable energy is generations away from being anywhere close to the point of supporting mankind (at its current population and demand). What do you suggest mankind do in the meantime, return to caves? That's the problem with radical liberalism like this. It's this unreasonable kind of thinking that stops real progress from being made. Instead of drastically cutting back on fossil fuels by working hard on modern nuclear power, we get rantings from the left saying we shouldn't invest in anything except "green" power. And, in the meantime, we keep burning fossil fuels like fucking crazy and perpetuating all the problems that come along with dirty fuel instead of creating an intelligent framework for bridging the gap between fossil fuel consumption and sustainable green energy. |
It's true.
What ALSO doesn't help is that pretty much every esimate and climate model has GREATLY been exagerated and keep getting proven false over and over again. So it's rather hard to acually even tell the real results.
The whole field is politics in the way of progress.
Green Energy would be good for so many other reasons... but then everything turns out to be overexagerrated and possible just completely manufactured.
The only climate news I ever see on the BBC or anywhere is how some model or some prediction or something else, was way off and not as bad as people thought.








