Qays said:
You're seriously comparing the graphics differential between the PS2 and original Xbox to that between the Wii and the HD twins? Seriously? Come on. Online wasn't a prerequisite for the core gamer last generation like it is now. And it doesn't matter if Wiimote nunchuk is "honestly capable of handling most genres fine". Core gamers don't like it. That is what we're talking about, isn't it? The reason why the Wii has failed to win over the core? |
OMG THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
the wii in comparison to the HD twins is very very inferior a product, the ps2 was only slightly inferior to the xbox. and you can't compare the 2 because the ps2 was last gen and that there is why it gets no support, it's NOT 3rd party developers fault the wii is nothing more than a re-skinned gamecube with motion controls. and no one in the "up market" will EVER choose a wii version of any mutiplat game, because the wii version will be inferior by default and that's just a fact. The only other option by 3rd parties is to make games exclusively for the wii and completely ignore the HD twins to which I respond THIS IS NEXT GEN, which is now current gen, and no developer is going to waste time making games on the last gen hardware by comparison, no matter how much it sells.
the sooner wii fans can accept this, the better off you will all be. Because if the wii could provide an experience to HD consoles, akin to what the ps2 could do compared to it's competitors the 3rd party support you guys want, would be there.







