Motion Controls should slow down the action.

[LordTheNightKnight]

leatherhat said:

LordTheNightKnight said:

1. I didn't mean those two games either. There were a couple of tennis games, and EA's PGA games, for one, that are noted to have better controls than with buttons (sales are bad for PGA, but it got dragged down by the Tiger Woods scandal).

2. That list doesn't say "vast majority" to me. 1. And you're acting like it's a good thing for developers to decide they are above the tastes of gamers.  2. This is a business, not an art studio.

1. Well, I would say they are in accord with gamers tastes. Motion gaming hasn't done a very good job of grabbing their attention.

2. You just opened up a whole new can of worms.

1. So you are claiming those that bought Wii Sport Resort in droves are not gamers. That is bull, especially since those other sports series were never that big even with gamepad controls.

2. Thinking gaming is supposed to be about what the customers want, not the developers, is a can of worms? How about that's what EVERY BUSINESS ON EARTH is like, and most of the developers you named even know that (Valve didn't make Steam solely for their own pleasure).

Heck, and you're wrong about those developers thinking they are above motion controls, since a lot have basically said they are good with current controls, not that they think they are inherently superior. It's more they don't have any ideas for killer motion control games than actively resisting it.